Wallenstein BX36S vs BX52S: branch size and folding storage
The BX52S raises the published diameter from 3.5 to 5 inches and adds a folding hopper. It also moves the engine-horsepower band from 12–30 to 22–55. If the smaller capacity is sufficient, the BX36S is the fixed-hopper option; if storage requires folding, verify the BX52S dimensions because its page and manual disagree.
By Acreage Equipment · Reviewed November 7, 2026 · Specification research, not a field test
Wallenstein BX36S: when to shortlist itConsider when the 3.5-inch diameter specification and fixed 55×45×60-inch envelope suit the material and storage plan, subject to engine-band, full-load and driveline checks.
Wallenstein BX52S: when to shortlist itConsider when the 5-inch diameter specification or folding hopper solves a specific need and the 22–55 engine-hp band applies; confirm actual folded dimensions and the complete operating load first.
Official U.S. pages checked November 7, 2026. Wallenstein has no captured numeric manufacturer price and needs a seller quote. Woodland amounts, where present, are dated USD base listings, not a complete delivered cost. No price ranking or stock promise is made. Open your saved comparison →
The differences that matter.
01
Diameter and housing opening
BX36S: 3.5-inch published diameter; 3.5×9-inch housing opening. BX52S: 5-inch published diameter; 5×10-inch housing opening.
The larger model changes both diameter and opening geometry. The long opening dimension is not an additional round-log rating, and neither minimum engine rating promises maximum-diameter processing.
For a tractor below 22 engine hp, the published lower bounds distinguish the models. These are engine-based screens; do not compare the numbers directly with a PTO-only rating or infer full-capacity performance.
BX36S: fixed hopper; 55×45×60 inches L×W×H. BX52S: fold-up hopper; page 43×42×66 folded, but manual 43×55×66 is unlabeled.
BX52S offers a documented folding mechanism. Obtain its actual folded width and length before choosing on storage space; the larger model cannot be declared easier to store from inconsistent dimensions.
Check how the material enters and where chips must be collected. A larger hopper mouth does not remove branch-shape or housing-opening limits; chute rotation remains disputed.
BX36S: 395 lb Total Weight; 96 lb rotor-only figure. BX52S: 505 lb Total Weight; 125 lb rotor-only figure.
The figures show different model/component scale, but their operating inclusions are not defined. Obtain complete mass for each before making a lift or ballast comparison.
Consider when the 3.5-inch diameter specification and fixed 55×45×60-inch envelope suit the material and storage plan, subject to engine-band, full-load and driveline checks.
Consider when the 5-inch diameter specification or folding hopper solves a specific need and the 22–55 engine-hp band applies; confirm actual folded dimensions and the complete operating load first.
Both models have inconsistent discharge-rotation and PTO-height unit entries.
BX52S page/manual dimensions disagree.
Reference weights omit a confirmed shaft-inclusive operating basis.
Manufacturer product pages and their linked manuals were checked November 7, 2026. Document conflicts are retained. No field testing or manufacturer-approved tractor pairing is claimed.
FOLLOW THE NUMBERS
Sources & documentation
Research record reviewed November 7, 2026. Confirm the current manual and the exact revision supplied with your machine.
