Farmry LFP47 vs TMG TFMS50: fixed Y-blades or hydraulic side shift?
The main reason to move from LFP47 to TFMS50 is powered lateral reach. Their listed cuts differ by less than two inches, while TFMS50 adds a hydraulic side-shift system and a higher operating-weight figure. Decide where you need the cutter relative to the tire track, then confirm the hydraulic circuit and power requirements. A narrower hydraulic mower is not automatically easier for a small tractor to carry or power.
By Acreage Equipment · Reviewed November 7, 2026 · Specification research, not a field test
LFP47: a fixed deck with Y-bladesConsider when a fixed cut and Y-blade configuration meet the task without powered side shift, after tractor-power basis is clarified.
TFMS50: when powered lateral reach mattersConsider when lateral reach justifies the heavier attachment and hydraulic connection, only after TMG resolves power limits and hydraulic requirements.
Dated U.S. seller prices are shown with each product’s check date. Shipping, tax, options and current stock require a new seller quote. TFMS50 was re-observed at $2,799 later on November 7 versus the earlier $2,499 retained observation; obtain a current quote. Open your saved comparison →
The differences that matter.
01
Offset and hydraulic setup
LFP47: Fixed deck; RAM field is NO. TFMS50: About 14 inches hydraulic side shift; cylinder and two hoses.
Choose TFMS50 for a documented need to move the cutter sideways, subject to remote circuit and clearance confirmation; LFP47 avoids that additional circuit requirement.
Consider when lateral reach justifies the heavier attachment and hydraulic connection, only after TMG resolves power limits and hydraulic requirements.
Neither tractor-power band identifies engine/PTO basis. TFMS50’s manual also sets a 50 PTO-hp ceiling. Hydraulic flow, pressure and coupler compatibility remain unverified.
LFP47 has an unresolved oil-specification difference between page and manual. TFMS50’s operation weight does not explicitly state shaft/fluid inclusion.
Editorial review: November 7, 2026. New product sources were checked November 7; retained product evidence remains dated November 6 where noted in the source records. Selection advice interprets published specifications; no physical comparison was performed.
FOLLOW THE NUMBERS
Sources & documentation
Research record reviewed November 7, 2026. Confirm the current manual and the exact revision supplied with your machine.